The latest ID trends in corporate design and development
sound very similar to ID trends in education especially technology based
delivery. Teachers are encouraged to use
the latest technology to supplement learning in their k12 classrooms because it
appeals to their students, might motivate them to do work they’d otherwise not
do, and makes differentiating instruction easier. In higher education, technology-based
training comes in the form of online education and more and more, schools and
universities are moving towards online education because it’s cheaper and may
increase enrollment. The verdict is out
on whether it is as effective as f2f learning.
However, because in business and industry, the bottom line is all about
money and how much a company has and it’s earning potential, and faster
results, corporate training “is taking full advantage of the benefits of
web-based instruction” (pg. 183). Online
learning encourages self-paced learning as well as collaboration between
students. Training can be synchronous or
asynchronous which appeals to busy corporate workers who would probably
appreciate the ability to participate in the training modules when their
schedules permit.
In order to find resources for technology-based training for
business and industry, I simply googled “recourses for corporate trainers.” An
article from The Wall Street Journal entitled, “So Much Training, So Little To
Show For It” by Rachel Emma Silverman is a very interesting read. In it, she implies that training fails because
there is no follow-up to training and the assessments created for the training
are meaningless and inappropriate. So
much so that, Silverman says, “90% of new skills are lost within a year”
(2012). The article goes on to become a Q&A with Eduardo Salas, professor
of organizational psychology at the University of Central Florida. Points he made about corporate training and
Instructional Design include:
·
People think that by sending an unskilled
employee to training, they will come back completely trained & skilled
·
Organizations don’t take the time to analyze
their training needs (perfect opening for an ID)
·
Companies don’t assess learning
·
Think technology will solve all problems.
These issues are so similar to ID issues in K12 and higher
education! It’s outrageous how many
people think that technology is the panacea for lack of knowledge or skills. The
article is definitely worth reading, http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052970204425904578072950518558328.
Another resource that I found is Training Magazine (http://www.trainingmag.com/). To be
perfectly honest, I think I’m most impressed because it is a free resource
online. It’s been around for 50 years
and even though it isn’t completely focused on Instructional Design, I think it
would be a good read for most people who are doing ID in business and industry. Articles in the current issue include: In Pursuit of Life Long Learning and The Role of the Future in Training &
Development Today. Using the
websites search function I did a search of “instructional design” and was
pleasantly surprised by the results. A
quick scan of the abstracts of articles revealed that most of the articles
applied to my search.
Instructional Design in Europe
I think the single most important thing about what was said
in the text, Trends and Issues in
Instructional Design and Technology about this topic is, “Europe needs good
instructional design” (251). Instructional design is present, but not everyone
agrees on its importance. Some people
misbelieve instructional design indicates “rigid and outdated” (250). Online
learning is real and present in Europe, but often not well designed and
certainly not assessed to effectively reveal the outcomes of learning. “Onligning,” a term used to describe synchronous
online classes is currently a trend in Europe and there is a demand for better
online learning environments so strong instructional designers are needed!
No comments:
Post a Comment